David Bailey UK, 1938
Miles Davis, 1969
Archival Inkjet on paper, framed
Signed by the artist, on verso
Signed by the artist, on verso
Image: 36.83 x 36.83 cm
Sheet: 42 x 59.4 cm
Sheet: 42 x 59.4 cm
© David Bailey
By 1969, David Bailey had already rejected the formal conventions of earlier portraitists in favour of stark grounds, uncompromising crops, and apparent spontaneity. That same year, Miles Davis was moving...
By 1969, David Bailey had already rejected the formal conventions of earlier portraitists in favour of stark grounds, uncompromising crops, and apparent spontaneity. That same year, Miles Davis was moving from the modal jazz that had built his reputation toward the electric experimentation of 'B*tches Brew', unsettling his own legacy even as Bailey photographed him. The portrait thus marks a point in modern, post-war culture and music converged in a shared rejection of received form.
Bailey’s decisive moment captures Miles Davis, with tongue extended out mid-gesture, breaking from the studied composure of traditional portraiture. The high-contrast, unforgiving tonal register recurs throughout the artist’s photographs as a signature manner.
Bailey’s jazz portraits, Miles Davis and Dizzy Gillespie chief among them, form a distinct strand within his practice, set apart from the fashion and Box of Pin Ups that first established his position in the cultural scene of the 1960s. Here, the portrait is unadorned, closer to the forensic scrutiny Bailey reserved for his most admired sitters. It exemplifies the visual grammar, stark voids and unflinching crops, that critics regard as central to his contribution to twentieth-century portraiture.
Bailey’s decisive moment captures Miles Davis, with tongue extended out mid-gesture, breaking from the studied composure of traditional portraiture. The high-contrast, unforgiving tonal register recurs throughout the artist’s photographs as a signature manner.
Bailey’s jazz portraits, Miles Davis and Dizzy Gillespie chief among them, form a distinct strand within his practice, set apart from the fashion and Box of Pin Ups that first established his position in the cultural scene of the 1960s. Here, the portrait is unadorned, closer to the forensic scrutiny Bailey reserved for his most admired sitters. It exemplifies the visual grammar, stark voids and unflinching crops, that critics regard as central to his contribution to twentieth-century portraiture.